Is robotic knee replacement riskier than traditional surgery?

Robotic knee replacement is not generally considered inherently riskier than conventional knee replacement when it is performed in an appropriate patient by a surgeon trained in the system. The main surgical risks remain similar because both procedures involve replacing damaged knee surfaces with artificial components.

These risks can include infection, blood clots, bleeding, stiffness, injury to nerves or blood vessels, implant-related problems, and complications related to anaesthesia. Robotic technology does not eliminate these risks, but it is designed to give the surgeon additional information and control during planning, bone preparation, and implant positioning. Different robotic systems may also involve additional equipment, tracking devices, or pins, so patients should ask the surgeon how the specific platform works and whether it introduces any additional considerations.

Overall safety depends on several factors beyond the robot, including the patient’s age and medical health, surgeon experience, infection-control practices, anaesthesia, blood-clot prevention, and rehabilitation. Dr. Atul Mishra can assess whether robotic or conventional knee replacement is more appropriate after considering the patient’s knee anatomy, arthritis severity, overall health, and surgical requirements. The technology should support the surgical plan rather than determine it.